Discussion about this post

User's avatar
QUASAR's avatar

This made me think about assessment.

Many assessments are designed to listen at Level 1: they check whether a student produced the expected answer.

A good teacher often operates closer to Level 2, trying to understand the student's reasoning.

The most valuable feedback may come from something like Level 3—listening not just to the answer itself, but to the misconceptions, confidence, uncertainty, and mental model behind it.

Sometimes what a student is thinking is more informative than whether they got the answer right.

Dieter Zibert's avatar

The "accurately" level is the one I wish more project managers practised. In requirements workshops I have lost count of how many scope disasters traced back to someone nodding instead of reflecting back "what I am hearing is A, B, C, is that right?". The counterintuitive part you name is the real value: a "no" at that moment is a gift, because it surfaces the gap while it still costs nothing to fix.

And the empathy-without-collusion distinction works just as well with a frustrated sponsor. You can show you understand the frustration without signing up to the conclusion behind it.

No posts

Ready for more?